↓ Skip to main content

The Cardiorenal Syndrome: Lessons from the ADHERE Database and Treatment Options

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Failure Reviews, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Cardiorenal Syndrome: Lessons from the ADHERE Database and Treatment Options
Published in
Heart Failure Reviews, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10741-005-6129-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Thomas Heywood

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 66%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Heart Failure Reviews
#233
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,311
of 140,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Failure Reviews
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.