↓ Skip to main content

A simple method to prepare boron suboxide fibres

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Electroceramics, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 175)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
A simple method to prepare boron suboxide fibres
Published in
Journal of Electroceramics, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10832-006-0457-1
Authors

Minghe Cao, Jun Jiang, Hanxing Liu, Jun Yuan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 4 44%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Electroceramics
#35
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,853
of 156,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Electroceramics
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.