↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of the development of reference materials for the detection of Ag nanoparticles in food: neat dispersions and spiked chicken meat

Overview of attention for article published in Accreditation and Quality Assurance, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 123)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility of the development of reference materials for the detection of Ag nanoparticles in food: neat dispersions and spiked chicken meat
Published in
Accreditation and Quality Assurance, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00769-014-1100-5
Authors

Ringo Grombe, Günter Allmaier, Jean Charoud-Got, Agnieszka Dudkiewicz, Håkan Emteborg, Thilo Hofmann, Erik Huusfeldt Larsen, Angela Lehner, Meritxell Llinàs, Katrin Loeschner, Kristian Mølhave, Ruud J. Peters, John Seghers, Conxita Solans, Frank von der Kammer, Stephan Wagner, Stefan Weigel, Thomas P. J. Linsinger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 21 26%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 26 33%
Environmental Science 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Engineering 6 8%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2015.
All research outputs
#1,010,660
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Accreditation and Quality Assurance
#1
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,882
of 353,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Accreditation and Quality Assurance
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them