↓ Skip to main content

BMP-2 induces motility and invasiveness by promoting colon cancer stemness through STAT3 activation

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
BMP-2 induces motility and invasiveness by promoting colon cancer stemness through STAT3 activation
Published in
Tumor Biology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-3681-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bo Ram Kim, Sang Cheul Oh, Dae-Hee Lee, Jung Lim Kim, Suk Young Lee, Myoung Hee Kang, Sun Il Lee, Sanghee Kang, Sung Yup Joung, Byung Wook Min

Abstract

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have been involved in metastatic progression and tumorigenesis of many cancer types. However, it remains unclear how BMP-2 contributes to the initiation and development of these cancers. Here, we investigated the role of BMP-2 in colon cancer stem cell (CSC) development from colon cancer cells. We also determined the effects of BMP-2 on CSC development and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in human colon cancer cell lines HCT-116 and SW620. We found that BMP-2 enhanced sphere formation of colon cancer cells without serum. Also, BMP-2-induced spheres displayed up-regulation of stemness markers (CD133+ and EpCAM+) and increased drug resistance, hallmarks of CSCs. Importantly, expression of EMT activators p-Smad1/5 and Snail and N-cadherin was increased in the spheres' cells, indicating that BMP-2 signaling might result in CSC self-renewal and EMT. Furthermore, siRNA-mediated knockdown of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) in HCT-116 cells reversed BMP-2-induced EMT and stem cell formation. Taken together, our results suggest that the BMP-2 induced STAT3-mediated induction of colon cancer cell metastasis requires an EMT and/or changes in CSC markers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 3%
Luxembourg 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2015.
All research outputs
#14,818,336
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#969
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,599
of 262,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#39
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.