| Title |
ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2008 update)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Documenta Ophthalmologica, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10633-008-9155-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. F. Marmor, A. B. Fulton, G. E. Holder, Y. Miyake, M. Brigell, M. Bach, (for the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision) |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 6 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 253 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 75 | 27% |
| Unknown | 35 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 8% |
| Engineering | 16 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,796,402
of 25,363,868 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#15
of 484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,961
of 180,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,868 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them