↓ Skip to main content

Frame-based stereotactic biopsy remains an important diagnostic tool with distinct advantages over frameless stereotactic biopsy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Frame-based stereotactic biopsy remains an important diagnostic tool with distinct advantages over frameless stereotactic biopsy
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, June 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11060-004-4208-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin S. Smith, Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa, Nicholas M. Barbaro, Michael W. McDermott

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 41%
Neuroscience 10 11%
Engineering 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,066
of 2,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,472
of 57,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,989 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.