↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Established Diagnostic Methodologies and a Novel Bacterial smpB Real-Time PCR Assay for Specific Detection of Haemophilus influenzae Isolates Associated with Respiratory Tract Infections

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Established Diagnostic Methodologies and a Novel Bacterial smpB Real-Time PCR Assay for Specific Detection of Haemophilus influenzae Isolates Associated with Respiratory Tract Infections
Published in
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2015
DOI 10.1128/jcm.00777-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Reddington, Stefan Schwenk, Nina Tuite, Gareth Platt, Danesh Davar, Helena Coughlan, Yoann Personne, Vanya Gant, Virve I. Enne, Alimuddin Zumla, Thomas Barry

Abstract

H. influenzae is a significant causative agent of Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI) worldwide. There is a requirement for the development of a rapid H. influenzae diagnostics assay which would allow for the implementation of infection control measures and also improve antimicrobial stewardship for patients.A number of nucleic acid diagnostics approaches have been described in the literature that detect H. influenzae in RTIs, however there are reported specificity and sensitivity limitations for these assays. In this study a novel real-time PCR diagnostics assay targeting the smpB gene was designed to detect all serogroups of H. influenzae. The assay was validated using a panel of well characterised Haemophilus species.Subsequently, a collection of 44 Haemophilus clinical isolates were collected and 36 isolates were identified as H. influenzae using a gold standard methodology which combined the results of MALDI-TOF MS and a fucK diagnostics assay. Using the novel smpB diagnostics assay, 100% concordance was observed with the gold standard demonstrating a sensitivity of 100% (95% Confidance Interval (CI): 90.26-100.00) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 63.06 to 100.00) when used on clinical isolates.To demonstrate the clinical utility of the diagnostics assay presented, a panel of lower RTI samples (n =98) were blindly tested with the gold standard and smpB diagnostics assays. The results generated were concordant for 94/98 samples tested demonstrating a sensitivity of 90.91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.33-97.47) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 93.40 to 100.00) for the novel smpB assay when used directly on respiratory specimens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 18%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Other 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 12 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,754,661
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#5,356
of 14,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,099
of 278,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#35
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.