↓ Skip to main content

miR-9 promotes cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis by targeting LASS2 in bladder cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
miR-9 promotes cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis by targeting LASS2 in bladder cancer
Published in
Tumor Biology, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-3713-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haifeng Wang, Wei Zhang, Yigang Zuo, Mingxia Ding, Changxing Ke, Ruping Yan, Hui Zhan, Jingyu Liu, Jiansong Wang

Abstract

MicroRNA-9 upregulation was reported in several tumors. However, its function and mechanism in human bladder cancer remains obscure. The present study aims to identify the expression pattern, biological roles and potential mechanism of miR-9 in human bladder cancers. We found that expression level of miR-9 in bladder cancer tissues was higher than normal tissues. miR-9 mimic transfection was performed in T24 and 5637 cells with low miR-9 expression, and miR-9 inhibitor was employed in BIU-87 cell line with high endogenous expression. miR-9 increased cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, invasion and chemoresistance, with upregulation of cyclin D1, MMP9, Bcl-2, and survivin and downregulation of E-cadherin. Using luciferase reporter assay, we confirmed that LASS2 was a direct target of miR-9 in bladder cancer cells. Transfection of miR-9 mimic downregulated LASS2 expression. LASS2 transfection downregulated Bcl-2 and survivin expression, which were induced by miR-9 mimic in both cell lines. In conclusion, these results indicate that miR-9 upregulation might be associated with malignant phenotype of bladder cancer. miR-9 promotes chemoresistance of bladder cancer cells by target LASS2.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 31%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,282,766
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,834
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,888
of 262,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#114
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.