↓ Skip to main content

Intravenous self-administration of cocaine under concurrent VI schedules of reinforcement

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, October 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous self-administration of cocaine under concurrent VI schedules of reinforcement
Published in
Psychopharmacology, October 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02246127
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. L. Woolverton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 3 27%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 27%
Neuroscience 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Design 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,113
of 5,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,615
of 28,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.