↓ Skip to main content

Psychiatric Symptoms in Youth with a History of Autism and Optimal Outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Psychiatric Symptoms in Youth with a History of Autism and Optimal Outcome
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10803-015-2520-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alyssa Orinstein, Katherine E. Tyson, Joyce Suh, Eva Troyb, Molly Helt, Michael Rosenthal, Marianne L. Barton, Inge-Marie Eigsti, Elizabeth Kelley, Letitia Naigles, Robert T. Schultz, Michael C. Stevens, Deborah A. Fein

Abstract

Since autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is often comorbid with psychiatric disorders, children who no longer meet criteria for ASD (optimal outcome; OO) may still be at risk for psychiatric disorders. A parent interview for DSM-IV psychiatric disorders (K-SADS-PL) for 33 OO, 42 high-functioning autism (HFA) and 34 typically developing (TD) youth, ages 8-21, showed that OO and HFA groups had elevated current ADHD and specific phobias, with tics in HFA. In the past, the HFA group also had elevated depression and ODD, and the OO group had tics. The HFA group also showed subthreshold symptoms of specific and social phobias, and generalized anxiety. Psychopathology in the OO group abated over time as did their autism, and decreased more than in HFA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 38 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 54 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,248,225
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#491
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,976
of 265,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#8
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.