↓ Skip to main content

Patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis: an important subgroup of knee osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis: an important subgroup of knee osteoarthritis
Published in
Rheumatology, May 2007
DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/kem114
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. S. Hinman, K. M. Crossley

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent disease afflicting elderly people. As the knee joint is tri-compartmental, numerous radiographic patterns of disease are possible. The patellofemoral joint (PFJ) is one of the most commonly affected compartments. Although PFJ OA is frequently observed, this particular disease sub-group has gone largely unrecognised. Recent research suggests that not only is the PFJ an important source of symptoms in knee OA, but also that afflicted individuals demonstrate disease features distinct from those observed in tibiofemoral joint OA. This has implications for the assessment and treatment of patients with PFJ OA. This review summarises the evidence suggesting why PFJ OA should be considered a distinct clinical entity and how it may best be managed using conservative, non-pharmacological treatment approaches that are targeted to the PFJ. Interventions such as patella taping, patella bracing and physiotherapy have the potential to alleviate joint stress and symptoms for people with this condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 220 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 14%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 49 21%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 11%
Engineering 16 7%
Sports and Recreations 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 61 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,720,232
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology
#4,492
of 6,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,812
of 71,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology
#54
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.