↓ Skip to main content

Origin of the Olympus Mons aureole and perimeter scarp

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Moon, and Planets, April 1980
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Origin of the Olympus Mons aureole and perimeter scarp
Published in
Earth, Moon, and Planets, April 1980
DOI 10.1007/bf00898433
Authors

Rosaly M. C. Lopes, J. E. Guest, C. J. Wilson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 83%
Engineering 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,296,578
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#76
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,600
of 6,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them