Title |
Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Postoperative Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Pilot Study in Breast Augmentation Patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, May 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00266-008-9169-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Per Hedén, Arthur A. Pilla |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 78 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
Researcher | 12 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Other | 19 | 23% |
Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 46% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 4% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,922,665
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#128
of 1,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,458
of 84,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.