| Title |
Effects of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) infusion in humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00228-005-0010-1 |
| Authors |
Jan T. Kielstein, Dimitrios Tsikas, Danilo Fliser |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 21% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#844
of 2,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,596
of 58,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.