| Title |
Negative effects of Rhabdias bufonis (Nematoda) on the growth and survival of toads (Bufo bufo)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, February 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00317213 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. P. Goater, P. I. Ward |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Romania | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 64% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,463,181
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,677
of 4,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,483
of 61,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.