| Title |
Clinical application of scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-008-0663-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Junji Iwasa, Lars Engebretsen, Yosuke Shima, Mitsuo Ochi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 18% |
| Researcher | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 45 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,022
of 2,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,385
of 167,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.