↓ Skip to main content

Corticosteroid exposure in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Corticosteroid exposure in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-3953-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadir Yehya, Sabah Servaes, Neal J. Thomas, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Vijay Srinivasan

Abstract

Use of systemic corticosteroids in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial, and studies in children are lacking. We performed an observational, single-center study in a prospectively enrolled cohort of children meeting criteria for ARDS (both Berlin 2012 and AECC 1994 acute lung injury) and pediatric ARDS (PARDS, as defined by PALICC 2015). Comprehensive analysis of corticosteroid utilization was planned, and detailed information collected on corticosteroid use, timing, treatment duration, and cumulative dose while mechanically ventilated. We assessed the association between corticosteroid exposure >24 h and outcomes. Of the 283 children with PARDS (37 deaths, 13 %), 169 (60 %) received corticosteroids for >24 h while ventilated: 51 % hydrocortisone, 41 % methylprednisolone, 5 % dexamethasone, 3 % combination of corticosteroids. Corticosteroid exposure >24 h was associated with increased mortality, fewer ventilator-free days at 28 days (VFD), and longer duration of ventilation in survivors in unadjusted analyses (all p < 0.05). Multivariate and propensity score adjusted analyses confirmed independent association of corticosteroid exposure with fewer VFD and longer duration of ventilation in survivors, but not with mortality. In planned analyses of high-risk subgroups, no benefit was seen with corticosteroids exposure, with fewer VFD associated with corticosteroid exposure >24 h in patients with ≥3 organ failures and immunocompromised patients. Corticosteroid exposure >24 h was independently associated with fewer VFD and longer duration of ventilation in survivors, even after adjustment for key potential confounders, including severity of illness, oxygenation index, immunocompromised status, and number of organ failures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 21%
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 75%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 11 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,205,870
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,194
of 5,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,370
of 279,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#27
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.