| Title |
Development of a non-invasive treatment system for urinary incontinence using a functional continuous magnetic stimulator (FCMS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, November 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02518872 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N. Ishikawa, S. Suda, T. Sasaki, T. Yamanishi, H. Hosaka, K. Yasuda, H. Ito |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 38% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 23% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#547
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,750
of 41,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.