↓ Skip to main content

A Physical Model and Improved Experimental Data Correlation for Wind Induced Flame Drag in Pool Fires

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Technology, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
A Physical Model and Improved Experimental Data Correlation for Wind Induced Flame Drag in Pool Fires
Published in
Fire Technology, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10694-009-0107-7
Authors

Phani K. Raj

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 33%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 40%
Chemical Engineering 2 13%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Fire Technology
#275
of 796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,338
of 93,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Technology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 796 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.