| Title |
Clostridium difficile: Emergence of Hypervirulence and Fluoroquinolone Resistance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Infection, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s15010-007-6113-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
B. Razavi, A. Apisarnthanarak, L. M. Mundy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 30% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2013.
All research outputs
#4,769,859
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#243
of 1,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,596
of 71,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.