↓ Skip to main content

Mesoporous niobium oxides with tailored pore structures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Mesoporous niobium oxides with tailored pore structures
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10853-008-2904-7
Authors

Li Yuan, Vadim V. Guliants

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Researcher 5 28%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 61%
Chemical Engineering 3 17%
Engineering 3 17%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2012.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#941
of 4,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,075
of 85,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,638 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.