↓ Skip to main content

Constraints and tensions in testing general relativity from Planck and CFHTLenS data including intrinsic alignment systematics

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Constraints and tensions in testing general relativity from Planck and CFHTLenS data including intrinsic alignment systematics
Published in
Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology, July 2015
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.92.023003
Authors

Jason N. Dossett, Mustapha Ishak, David Parkinson, Tamara M. Davis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Professor 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 11 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,051,839
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology
#8,745
of 44,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,392
of 276,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology
#54
of 858 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44,256 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 858 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.