↓ Skip to main content

Applications of improved stoichiometric model in medium design and fed-batch cultivation of animal cells in bioreactor

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Cell Science, February 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Applications of improved stoichiometric model in medium design and fed-batch cultivation of animal cells in bioreactor
Published in
Methods in Cell Science, February 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00762376
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liangzhi Xie, Daniel I. C. Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 33%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 27%
Engineering 16 22%
Chemical Engineering 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#356
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,629
of 72,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#14
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.