↓ Skip to main content

An open label, non-comparative phase II study of gemcitabine as salvage treatment for patients with pretreated adult type soft tissue sarcoma

Overview of attention for article published in Investigational New Drugs, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
An open label, non-comparative phase II study of gemcitabine as salvage treatment for patients with pretreated adult type soft tissue sarcoma
Published in
Investigational New Drugs, August 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10637-005-3537-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. T. Hartmann, K. Oechsle, J. Huober, A. Jakob, M. Azemar, M. Horger, L. Kanz, C. Bokemeyer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 33%
Student > Postgraduate 3 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2012.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Investigational New Drugs
#328
of 1,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,401
of 58,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigational New Drugs
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.