| Title |
Generation of trangenic Xenopus laevis using the Sleeping Beauty transposon system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Transgenic Research, September 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11248-006-9014-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Sinzelle, J. Vallin, L. Coen, A. Chesneau, D. Du Pasquier, N. Pollet, B. Demeneix, A. Mazabraud |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2012.
All research outputs
#4,769,859
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Transgenic Research
#188
of 895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,294
of 67,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transgenic Research
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.