↓ Skip to main content

Single-tube genotyping of MBL-2 polymorphisms using melting temperature analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Single-tube genotyping of MBL-2 polymorphisms using melting temperature analysis
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Medicine, July 2002
DOI 10.1007/s102380200014
Pubmed ID
Authors

U. Hladnik, L. Braida, M. Boniotto, D. Pirulli, F. Gerin, A. Amoroso, S. Crovella

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 15%
United States 1 8%
Unknown 10 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 38%
Professor 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Medicine
#88
of 510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,691
of 45,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them