| Title |
The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC): a functional catalogue of the mammalian genome that informs conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-018-1072-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Violeta Muñoz-Fuentes, Pilar Cacheiro, Terrence F. Meehan, Juan Antonio Aguilar-Pimentel, Steve D. M. Brown, Ann M. Flenniken, Paul Flicek, Antonella Galli, Hamed Haseli Mashhadi, Martin Hrabě de Angelis, Jong Kyoung Kim, K. C. Kent Lloyd, Colin McKerlie, Hugh Morgan, Stephen A. Murray, Lauryl M. J. Nutter, Patrick T. Reilly, John R. Seavitt, Je Kyung Seong, Michelle Simon, Hannah Wardle-Jones, Ann-Marie Mallon, Damian Smedley, Helen E. Parkinson, the IMPC consortium |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,440,254
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#238
of 1,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,455
of 347,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.