↓ Skip to main content

Understanding Each Other: The Case of the Derrida-Searle Debate

Overview of attention for article published in Human Studies, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Understanding Each Other: The Case of the Derrida-Searle Debate
Published in
Human Studies, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10746-011-9189-6
Authors

Stanley Raffel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Lecturer 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 6 33%
Arts and Humanities 3 17%
Social Sciences 3 17%
Psychology 2 11%
Linguistics 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,660,080
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from Human Studies
#66
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,852
of 120,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Studies
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.