| Title |
Preparation of Gold Nanoparticles and their Applications in Anisotropic Nanoparticle Synthesis and Bioimaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plasmonics, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11468-009-9078-2 |
| Authors |
Ken-Tye Yong, Mark T. Swihart, Hong Ding, Paras N. Prasad |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 40% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 41 | 33% |
| Materials Science | 21 | 17% |
| Engineering | 17 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Plasmonics
#36
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,105
of 93,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plasmonics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them