↓ Skip to main content

Cervical Positioning for Reduction of Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Mild-to-Moderate OSAS

Overview of attention for article published in Sleep and Breathing, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Cervical Positioning for Reduction of Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Mild-to-Moderate OSAS
Published in
Sleep and Breathing, April 2001
DOI 10.1007/s11325-001-0071-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clete A. Kushida, Candida M. A. Sherrill, Seung C. Hong, Luciana Palombini, Pamela Hyde, William C. Dement

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 22%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Breathing
#332
of 1,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,391
of 41,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Breathing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,402 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them