↓ Skip to main content

Which Commercial Thickening Agent Do Patients Prefer?

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia, February 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Which Commercial Thickening Agent Do Patients Prefer?
Published in
Dysphagia, February 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00455-002-0084-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Elizabeth Macqueen, Shana Taubert, Deirdre Cotter, Susan Stevens, Gary Steven Frost

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Psychology 4 7%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#597
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,866
of 129,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.