↓ Skip to main content

An algorithm for calculating water surface elevations from surface gradient image data

Overview of attention for article published in Experiments in Fluids, May 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
An algorithm for calculating water surface elevations from surface gradient image data
Published in
Experiments in Fluids, May 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00204634
Authors

X. Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Researcher 6 23%
Unspecified 5 19%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 14 54%
Unspecified 5 19%
Physics and Astronomy 4 15%
Mathematics 1 4%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#158
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,435
of 27,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.