↓ Skip to main content

Information practices and cognitive artifacts in scientific research

Overview of attention for article published in Cognition, Technology & Work, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Information practices and cognitive artifacts in scientific research
Published in
Cognition, Technology & Work, May 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10111-005-0178-2
Authors

Peter H. Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 11%
Denmark 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 25%
Student > Master 6 21%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 14 50%
Social Sciences 7 25%
Design 3 11%
Psychology 1 4%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,339,713
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Cognition, Technology & Work
#117
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,724
of 58,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognition, Technology & Work
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them