↓ Skip to main content

Controller Area Network (CAN) schedulability analysis: Refuted, revisited and revised

Overview of attention for article published in Real-Time Systems, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
33 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
593 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Controller Area Network (CAN) schedulability analysis: Refuted, revisited and revised
Published in
Real-Time Systems, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11241-007-9012-7
Authors

Robert I. Davis, Alan Burns, Reinder J. Bril, Johan J. Lukkien

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 206 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 25%
Student > Master 42 19%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 34 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 90 41%
Engineering 86 39%
Materials Science 2 <1%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 37 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Real-Time Systems
#23
of 87 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,338
of 162,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Real-Time Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them