↓ Skip to main content

Eigentaste: A Constant Time Collaborative Filtering Algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in Information Retrieval Journal, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
1048 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
527 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
Title
Eigentaste: A Constant Time Collaborative Filtering Algorithm
Published in
Information Retrieval Journal, January 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1011419012209
Authors

Ken Goldberg, Theresa Roeder, Dhruv Gupta, Chris Perkins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 527 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 3%
Germany 9 2%
Brazil 4 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
China 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Other 21 4%
Unknown 454 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 122 23%
Student > Master 111 21%
Researcher 52 10%
Student > Bachelor 43 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 29 6%
Other 95 18%
Unknown 75 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 298 57%
Engineering 43 8%
Mathematics 20 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 20 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 2%
Other 48 9%
Unknown 88 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2014.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Information Retrieval Journal
#64
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,391
of 116,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Information Retrieval Journal
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them