You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bisphosphonates and implants
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Orthopaedica, July 2009
|
DOI | 10.1080/17453670902807466 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Per Aspenberg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 13% |
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 49% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 11% |
Materials Science | 4 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 20 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#4,769,859
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Acta Orthopaedica
#177
of 890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,343
of 110,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Orthopaedica
#24
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.