↓ Skip to main content

DMPS and N-acetylcysteine induced renal toxicity in mice exposed to mercury

Overview of attention for article published in BioMetals, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
DMPS and N-acetylcysteine induced renal toxicity in mice exposed to mercury
Published in
BioMetals, August 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10534-005-4020-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Brandão, Francielli W. Santos, Gilson Zeni, João B. T. Rocha, Cristina W. Nogueira

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 22%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from BioMetals
#160
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,986
of 65,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMetals
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.