↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanical comparison of two different concepts for stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
103 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Biomechanical comparison of two different concepts for stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion
Published in
European Spine Journal, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00586-008-0797-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Schleicher, R. Gerlach, B. Schär, C. M. J. Cain, W. Achatz, R. Pflugmacher, N. P. Haas, F. Kandziora

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 10 12%
Other 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 38%
Engineering 19 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Materials Science 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 25 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,722,978
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,035
of 4,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,682
of 91,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,792 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.