| Title |
Type inference with non-structural subtyping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Formal Aspects of Computing, January 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01212524 |
| Authors |
Jens Palsberg, Mitchell Wand, Patrick O'Keefe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Taiwan | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 43% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 6 | 86% |
| Engineering | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Formal Aspects of Computing
#13
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,939
of 92,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Formal Aspects of Computing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them