You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The genetic association between personality and major depression or bipolar disorder. A polygenic score analysis using genome-wide association data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Translational Psychiatry, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/tp.2011.45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C M Middeldorp, M H M de Moor, L M McGrath, S D Gordon, D H Blackwood, P T Costa, A Terracciano, R F Krueger, E J C de Geus, D R Nyholt, T Tanaka, T Esko, P A F Madden, J Derringer, N Amin, G Willemsen, J-J Hottenga, M A Distel, M Uda, S Sanna, P Spinhoven, C A Hartman, S Ripke, P F Sullivan, A Realo, J Allik, A C Heath, M L Pergadia, A Agrawal, P Lin, R A Grucza, E Widen, D L Cousminer, J G Eriksson, A Palotie, J H Barnett, P H Lee, M Luciano, A Tenesa, G Davies, L M Lopez, N K Hansell, S E Medland, L Ferrucci, D Schlessinger, G W Montgomery, M J Wright, Y S Aulchenko, A C J W Janssens, B A Oostra, A Metspalu, G R Abecasis, I J Deary, K Räikkönen, L J Bierut, N G Martin, N R Wray, C M van Duijn, J W Smoller, B W J H Penninx, D I Boomsma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 18% |
| Professor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 40 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 36 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2014.
All research outputs
#14,431,072
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Translational Psychiatry
#2,369
of 3,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,507
of 140,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Psychiatry
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.