↓ Skip to main content

Pulse Transit Time by R-Wave-Gated Infrared Photoplethysmography: Review of the Literature and Personal Experience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Pulse Transit Time by R-Wave-Gated Infrared Photoplethysmography: Review of the Literature and Personal Experience
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, December 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10877-005-4300-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jochanan E. Naschitz, Stanislas Bezobchuk, Renata Mussafia-Priselac, Scott Sundick, Daniel Dreyfuss, Igal Khorshidi, Argyro Karidis, Hagit Manor, Mihael Nagar, Elisabeth Rubin Peck, Shannon Peck, Shimon Storch, Itzhak Rosner, Luis Gaitini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
India 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Unknown 82 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 35 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Computer Science 5 6%
Psychology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#208
of 703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,450
of 141,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them