| Title |
Proteomic profile of dormant Trichophyton Rubrum conidia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-9-303 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wenchuan Leng, Tao Liu, Rui Li, Jian Yang, Candong Wei, Wenliang Zhang, Qi Jin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Slovakia | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 24% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2014.
All research outputs
#4,769,859
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,019
of 10,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,917
of 82,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,702 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.