| Title |
A review of osteoinductive testing methods and sterilization processes for demineralized bone
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell and Tissue Banking, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10561-005-4252-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Glowacki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Banking
#71
of 292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,974
of 60,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Banking
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.