| Title |
Copper Compatible Barium Titanate Thin Films for Embedded Passives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Electroceramics, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10832-005-0866-6 |
| Authors |
Jon Ihlefeld, Brian Laughlin, Alisa Hunt-Lowery, William Borland, Angus Kingon, Jon-Paul Maria |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 27% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 22 | 45% |
| Engineering | 7 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Electroceramics
#35
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,974
of 60,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Electroceramics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.