| Title |
Analysis of E. coli K5 capsular polysaccharide heparosan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-010-3679-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mellisa Ly, Zhenyu Wang, Tatiana N. Laremore, Fuming Zhang, Weihong Zhong, Dennis Pu, Dmitri V. Zagorevski, Jonathan S. Dordick, Robert J. Linhardt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 25% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#2,202
of 9,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,174
of 103,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#30
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.