↓ Skip to main content

Why immunomodulatory therapies have not worked in sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, June 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
11 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Why immunomodulatory therapies have not worked in sepsis
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, June 1999
DOI 10.1007/s001340050903
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Abraham

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 3%
Romania 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Professor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Other 10 27%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,228
of 5,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,564
of 35,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.