| Title |
The Incidence of Lynch Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Familial Cancer, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10689-004-5811-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Albert de la Chapelle |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2014.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Familial Cancer
#100
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,463
of 69,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Familial Cancer
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them