↓ Skip to main content

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00464-009-0655-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andre Chow, Sanjay Purkayastha, Omer Aziz, Paraskevas Paraskeva

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 7 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 69%
Engineering 3 10%
Psychology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,706
of 6,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,769
of 107,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.