↓ Skip to main content

Risk Factors and Managements of Bile Leakage After Hepatectomy

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Risk Factors and Managements of Bile Leakage After Hepatectomy
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00268-015-3156-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuhiko Sakamoto, Takao Tamesa, Tokumitu Yukio, Yoshihiro Tokuhisa, Yoshinari Maeda, Masaaki Oka

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively determine the risk factors and evaluate the management of bile leakage. Three hundred and thirty-four patients who underwent hepatectomy for Child classification grade A liver disease, without biliary reconstruction and laparoscopic procedures, between 2003 and 2013 were included. Risk factors were identified using multivariate analysis. Bile leakage was observed in 30 (9.0 %) patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that type of hepatectomy (segmentectomy 1, medial sectionectomy, anterior sectionectomy, or central bisectionectomy) and operating time was independent risk factors for bile leakage. Among 30 patients with confirmed bile leakage, central type leakage that was in communication with the biliary tree occurred in 23 (76.7 %) patients and peripheral type, which was not in communication with the biliary tree, in 7 (23.3 %) patients. Ten patients were treated with only drainage. Endoscopic or percutaneous transhepatic procedures were performed in 15 cases with central type leakage. Ablation treatment using ethanol or minocycline was mainly performed for peripheral type leakage. Four cases with central type leakage had strictures of the right hepatic duct. Two of them were treated with ablation treatment, portal vein embolization, or fistulojejunostomy. Median duration from diagnosis to end of therapy was 77 days (11-323) in central type and 44 days (6-123) in peripheral type leakage, respectively. Complex hepatectomy and operating time are independent risk factors for postoperative bile leakage. Biliary exploration should be performed as soon as possible after diagnosis, because most bile leakage is the central type. Central type of bile leakage is sometimes refractory to therapy, needing various treatments and requiring a long time for recovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 49%
Psychology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2016.
All research outputs
#18,418,694
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,468
of 4,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,273
of 262,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#44
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.