| Title |
Complement Cls, a classical enzyme with novel functions at the endochondral ossification center: immunohistochemical staining of activated Cls with a neoantigen-specific antibody
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell and Tissue Research, May 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004410050841 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hisako Sakiyama, Koichi Nakagawa, Kazuko Kuriiwa, Kazushi Imai, Yasunori Okada, Toyomitsu Tsuchida, Hideshige Moriya, Shinobu Imajoh-Ohmi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 30% |
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 20% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#545
of 2,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,549
of 29,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them